Thursday, April 7, 2011

Heavy agenda tonight

Of note: Funding for preliminary engineering to construct the lost Jericho Corners pedestrian bridge repair appears on the next VTrans budget. The debate that occurred at town meeting should continue and we need to be watchful to ensure progress is forthcoming. But in regards to applying pressure on the state transportation officials, the selectboard does not believe this is the best course of action right now. 


On the docket for tonight:


Agenda Selectboard Meeting
April 7, 2011 at 7:00 p.m.
Jericho Town Hall, 67 Vermont Route 15


(All agendas are subject to change and times are approximate)


7:00 PM          PUBLIC TO BE HEARD

7:05 PM          BUSINESS

7:05          Lee River/Browns Trace Intersection Study – UVM Engineering Students
7:45          Browns Trace Multimodal Feasibility Study – Greg Bakos, VHB, Inc.
8:30         Conservation Committee Request for Wetland Mapping Project – CC Member
8:40         Plein Air Festival Request – Barbara Greene       
      • Town as Fiscal Sponsor 
      • Use of Jericho Center Green
8:50        Discussion of Town Meeting Issues
  • Pedestrian Bridge
  • Police Services
  • Auditor Positions
  • Noise Ordinance 


9:15         Dickenson St Alternatives Analysis Preferred Alternative Selection
9:30        Approve Recreation Program Summer Hires            
9:35        Approve Minutes of 3/1/11
                Approve Warrants of 3/21/11
                Other Business
    Possible Executive Session (personnel and contracts)
           
Adjourn

Sunday, February 27, 2011

Town Report

Here is this year's town report in a cool, online way:

Thursday, January 20, 2011

I'm going to tell you what I really think.

I'm not a politician. I don't even play one on TV, which you certainly know if you ever watch community access and see my joke-cracking and fumbling during our meetings.

I love this town. Jericho is an excellent place to live and play, and okay, it sounds cliché, but it is a great town in which to raise a family. That's why I'm here. Good schools, clean rivers, community-mindedness, lots of other folks move here for the same reason.
When I met my husband, we lived and worked in Portsmouth, NH. Also a great town surely, but for us, not a settling point. From a purely financial perspective, it just wasn't possible. He was a talented but underpaid staff photographer for a small daily newspaper. I was an enthusiastic marketing professional working for a non-profit. Portsmouth is a popular 2nd home spot, and a lovely haven near the water and just 45 minutes north of Boston. So, in 2000, there were very few "starter homes" available and the ones that were, were still wildly out of our price range.

Consequently, we decided just months after getting married to move to New Jersey where Ryan made a big career jump to chief photog at a major paper in NJ and I found a dream job with the Broadway magnate Shubert Organization. Work bliss ensued...until 9/11 occurred and we were swiftly and emotionally caught by the baby bug that happened post-trauma. So there we were, 2 little kids and living in New Jersey.
When Lucy was born, a nurse in the hospital, in the wee hours of the morning post-partum, opened up to me about raising kids in NJ. In my tired and elated haze, her sentiments lodged into my psyche. She told me that her 13 year old son had just had a near-breakdown before going to a birthday party because she wanted to buy a present for the birthday boy. Apparently, in the NJ suburbs, the only acceptable gift at such a gathering is $100 cash. The nurse, a single mom, was not happy about this, but the obvious distress and pressure her son conveyed persuaded her to oblige. 

The point is: from then on I was focused on getting us BACK TO VERMONT. I grew up in East Thetford, where you knew everyone in town. Pre-facebook, but still: no privacy. Only after I left for college did I realize that my town defined who I was and how I lived. The rest of the world (I've lived in plenty of places across the U.S.) is a vast sea of social rules, disparate communities, and mazes to navigate. Only in Vermont could I feel truly at home and happy. Especially in raising my beautiful kids.

But here's the thing: in 2006, when we moved to Jericho, there was only one house on the market that we could afford. We live in a 1200 sq ft ranch just off of Route 15. Hard work and good intentions, minus a trust fund, get you that. And I'm not complaining. We have a roof over our heads, good schools to shuttle our kiddos off to every day, and jobs in nearby Burlington. 

The Jericho Town Plan has been carefully written by the Planning Commission and submitted to the Selectboard for approval. I read it. I listened carefully as our Town Planner, Seth Jensen, made his presentation about the document. And I couldn't help but think that it kind of left my family out of the plan. And if I felt left out, lots and lots of other families--families with 2 working parents, with homes right on the busy and non-scenic Route 15--also are left out of this plan.  

So the plan talks about preserving the rural and historic nature of Jericho. But it doesn't talk about the other Jericho, where people live in areas that are targeted for commercial development, where our neighborhoods are made up of affordable ranches or split-level homes, where we deal every day with the increasing noise, pollution, and safety hazards of a major commuting thoroughfare that blazes past our properties.

I hesitantly voiced these concerns and requested that the Town Plan address the lives of all residents of the town, not just those that want to preserve their pristine surroundings. I asked that we include language in the Town Plan that acknowledges these concerns. We added a statement about endeavoring to preserve livability for all residents of Jericho. It's not a lot, but it's something.


Thursday, January 6, 2011

Mobbs Farm Parking Lot

Special meeting this morning - at the town garage - to review the proposals for the Mobbs parking lot. Photos and more information coming soon.

Wednesday, December 15, 2010

Mobbs Hill parking lot, again.

[ I wrote this post after our 11/18/10 meeting but neglected to post it. ]

Just finished a boisterous meeting at town hall.

The heated topic, noted on the agenda as the Mobbs Parking Lot Discussion, did begin until a couple of hours after the meetings start.  The issue has to do with the location of the "new" parking lot off Browns Trace Road, near the town garage.

3 years ago, when our Development Review Board decided the details for the lot, there was a note on their decision that indicated that all parties--the town, the neighbors, and the Mobbs Committee--should seek a mediated process and try to find a solution that would be agreeable to everyone.

Two years ago the staff at the time did just that: the meeting was a productive one and the solution that everyone finally came to accept was very different from the DRB decision. The neighbors involved believed that the new plan was going forward. Meanwhile, the town administrator was replaced. The selectboard forgot to follow up. Nothing happened.

So here we are again, and we're left with the decision: do we go forward with the DRB-approved plan or pursue approval and funding for the idea which came from the ad-hoc committee? Strong opinions and emotions supply a wide range of judgement on this issue. At my request, the board will convene a short meeting at the site near the town garage in order to identify the various landmarks that have been so much a part of these discussions.

Review your new Town Plan

This week's meeting begins with a public hearing to discuss the new Town Plan. My apologies for the short notice, but if you have time to take a look at the documents, please do! More so now than ever, I would very much like to hear your opinions - either comment on this forum, send me an email, call me at 802-343-1265, or attend the meeting on Thursday, 12/16/10. 


Seth Jensen, Jericho's town planner, says that the most substantial changes in the new plan have to do with specificity, i.e. adding detail and definitions for certain topics. In particular, the sections on the town's energy plan and our economic development have been expanded. Also new: in the back of the plan is a table of long- and short-term priorities for tasks to be implemented.

Also on the agenda (12/16/10):


  • Jericho-Underhill Park District Board Member Interview – Michelle Hayes
  • Mobbs Farm Committee Request for Grant Submittal Approval
  • Town Library Request for Funds for Painting
  • Draft Town Plan and Zoning Map Discussion and Warn Public Hearings
  • Proposed FY12 Budget Overview
  • Approval of 11/18/10 & 12/2/10 minutes
  • Other business
  • Possible Executive Session (personnel)
Selectboard Meetings are the 1st & 3rd Thursdays of the month, 7:00 pm, Town Hall, 67 Route 15.

Sunday, October 17, 2010

Opinion on Dubie & Burn Ordinance

Dubie Declines Debate
A week and a half ago 400 municipal officials attended the Town Fair sponsored by the Vermont League of Cities of Town (VLCT). The biggest workshop on the schedule was a forum with the gubernatorial candidates. Guess what? Only one of the big two was in attendance. Shumlin was there, and although I didn't attend the session I heard he was very receptive and responsive to the issues and the questions of the crowd. So where was Dubie? Rumor has it that he declined the invitation to attend because his conditions for the forum weren't met--he wanted to be presented in a separate room and wouldn't participate in an unscripted debate. Hmmmm....why would a candidate for governor pass up the opportunity to campaign to such an influential and connected crowd?

Please, don't forget to vote on or before Nov. 2nd.

(GLENN RUSSELL, Burlington Free Press) Republican gubernatorial candidate Brian Dubie, and Democratic candidate Peter Shumlin. Read about it: "Dubie Snaps at Shumlin" or watch the video of the debate.


Part 2: Burn Policy Ordinance
We've finally arrived on a draft for the new burn policy. You can read the entire text here.

This is the summary of the proposed ordinance:

What can I burn?
  • “Natural Wood” = branches and brush less than 4” in diameter.
  • “Non-woody vegetation” = leaves, grass, yard trimmings and other organic materials
What type of burning requires a permit?
  • Burning natural wood or non-woody vegetation when there is no snow on the ground surrounding the area where the burn will take place.
  • A bonfire greater than thirty (30) inches in diameter when there is no snow on the ground surrounding the bonfire area.
  • Burning construction or demolition materials and commercial wastes only if approved by the Department of Environmental Conservation.
What does not require a permit?
  • Barbeque pits less than thirty (30) inches in diameter.
  • Campfires or bonfires less than thirty (30) inches in diameter.
  • Recreational burning of natural wood within a chiminea or similar open container.
  • Burning natural wood or non-woody vegetation when there is snow on the ground surrounding the area where the burn will take place.
What are the rules for burning?
  • All permitted and exempt fires shall be extinguished when not attended to.
  • All individuals conducting a permitted or exempt fire shall have means available to keep the fire under control or to extinguish it immediately.
  • A permitted or exempt fire is never allowed to smolder.
  • No structure can be intentionally burned.
  • An authorized individual may order any fire to be extinguished.
  • An authorized individual may inspect material to be burned and deny issuance of a permit as a result of the inspection.
  • No burning within 200’ of a woodland or forestland or field containing dry grass when there is no snow on the ground.
So if you have an opposition, or an opinion, on this ordinance, please let me know before the next Selectboard meeting, or attend the meeting in person, on Thursday 10/21/10.

Thanks, Kim